The New York Times reported on Pr. Obama's visit to Notre Dame to give the commencement address. He suggested that the dialogue needed to remain open between people on both sides of the issue and said things that on the surface appear reasonable.
The problem is that there are only two polarizing viewpoints. One side sees it as a personal rights issue, the woman's right to control her own body and to choose not to have an unwanted pregnancy. The other side sees it as personal rights issue, the right of the child in the womb not to be murdered. With only these two viewpoints, there is no room for compromise, no other voices, and both sides demonize the other. I think we need to think outside the box. Come up with other positions and widen this discussion among people of good will, as our President has asked us to.
This post is going to offer some other viewpoints on abortion for you to consider, you may add others in the comments.
The old viewpoints are "Abortion is Murder" or "It's not life until the baby is born." There may be some nuances I'm missing, but that's what I am starting with.
1. My first new viewpoint would be "Sure it's murder, but who cares?" If you want to kill your own offspring in the womb, have at. This eliminates my need to be involved in what abortion rights activists call "the woman's choice". I can think it's murder, but like murders committed in some third world country, I can think it's wrong and do nothing.
2. The 90 day return. This would be the personal responsibility viewpoint. It's your fetus, you deal with it. We declare that fetuses are not babies until they have been viable outside the womb for 90 days. At 90 days, you can get a birth certificate and give the fetus a name, thus making it a baby. Until then, if you don't want it, you can deal with it. The kicker is you have to do it yourself. You don't get a doctor to make it look like a medical procedure. I call this one "the enhanced woman's right to choose." This removes medical personnel from abortion and reduces the profit motive for doctors and other medical personnel to be involved in abortions, taking pressure off the already strained health care system.
3. The Green Alternative. This position holds that every added human is an extra strain on Gaia. This makes not reproducing the moral high ground. Abortion is then seen a sacrifice that right thinking people make for the good of the planet.
4. The Teen Alternative. You don't really know what you're getting when you have a baby. It isn't until the kid hits puberty that you find out what a little sociopath you've been harboring. Retroactive abortion from ages 13-18, by the birth parents, would solve all of those issues. Kids would grow up knowing that they were on thin ice with Mom and Dad. The current entitlement issues the society has with teenagers would disappear. Getting good grades, coming in on time, helping with chores, speaking respectfully to their parents? No problem, Sir.
5. The One Mistake Rule. You get pregnant, it's like a first speeding ticket, you get a warning, the points get reduced. So, you get one abortion, courtesy of the State. Now you know what causes it. Get pregnant again, you either have the baby, or if you come seeking help again, the 2nd abortion comes with sterilization.
6. The Baby License. We set up a system where all adolescent females are on some form of effective birth control, imagine an annual shot that prevent ovulation. When a woman is ready to bear a child, she takes the required training courses, proves that she has the financial means to support the child, and she is allowed to forgo her shots and get pregnant. There are no abortions, because there are no unwanted pregnancies. There are no babies on welfare, because only licensed babies are born. Couple this with the Teen Alternative (see #4 above) and we would solve a lot of the problems we currently face.
With humans it's abortion, but with chickens it's an omelet.
--George Carlin